<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SVG issues and ideas for SVG Open talk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leuksman.com/log/2009/05/13/svg-issues-and-ideas-for-svg-open-talk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leuksman.com/log/2009/05/13/svg-issues-and-ideas-for-svg-open-talk/</link>
	<description>reticula, electronica, &#38; oddities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:40:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelt</title>
		<link>http://leuksman.com/log/2009/05/13/svg-issues-and-ideas-for-svg-open-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-29627</link>
		<dc:creator>stelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leuksman.com/log/?p=576#comment-29627</guid>
		<description>Some stuff related with Inkscape: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/message/62294

Personally i&#039;d like to edit SVG source code right on the site, where edits are only accepted after validation.

You probably already searched for &quot;SVG&quot; in Wikimedia&#039;s bug system, there&#039;s quite a list.

I&#039;d prefer SVG served directly, not a rasterization.
For semantic (searchability, by my browser and by search bots) use of SVG Text.
IE is a problem, but keep an eye on what is happening in the IE fixes space.

I&#039;ve heard many SVG files assume a default white screen/browser background.

Just from the top of my mind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some stuff related with Inkscape: <a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/message/62294" rel="nofollow">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/message/62294</a></p>
<p>Personally i&#8217;d like to edit SVG source code right on the site, where edits are only accepted after validation.</p>
<p>You probably already searched for &#8220;SVG&#8221; in Wikimedia&#8217;s bug system, there&#8217;s quite a list.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer SVG served directly, not a rasterization.<br />
For semantic (searchability, by my browser and by search bots) use of SVG Text.<br />
IE is a problem, but keep an eye on what is happening in the IE fixes space.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard many SVG files assume a default white screen/browser background.</p>
<p>Just from the top of my mind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milos Rancic</title>
		<link>http://leuksman.com/log/2009/05/13/svg-issues-and-ideas-for-svg-open-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-29618</link>
		<dc:creator>Milos Rancic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leuksman.com/log/?p=576#comment-29618</guid>
		<description>From time to time I have need to generate images (from Python). And whenever I start to do so, my mind is stuck in complex modules, like TkInter is.

*But*, SVG is the best answer for that. Generating SVG (by writing XML code) is really a great advantage for programming. Besides that, the code may be compatible between various programming languages. And, if some other format is needed, there is nothing easier than doing &quot;convert image.svg image.png&quot;, for example.

At the other side, I would really like to see more useful implementations of SVG viewers. AFAIK, by some features it is more advanced format than SWF. And it is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From time to time I have need to generate images (from Python). And whenever I start to do so, my mind is stuck in complex modules, like TkInter is.</p>
<p>*But*, SVG is the best answer for that. Generating SVG (by writing XML code) is really a great advantage for programming. Besides that, the code may be compatible between various programming languages. And, if some other format is needed, there is nothing easier than doing &#8220;convert image.svg image.png&#8221;, for example.</p>
<p>At the other side, I would really like to see more useful implementations of SVG viewers. AFAIK, by some features it is more advanced format than SWF. And it is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
